"Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura" (sundowne36)
10/08/2015 at 03:51 • Filed to: None
2
12|
"Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura" (sundowne36)
10/08/2015 at 03:51 • Filed to: None | 2
| 12 |
My sides, they hurt. This came from the Facebook page, by the way.
ktfright | Kinja Neighborhood Black Guy
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 04:01 |
|
:(
jester74
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 04:08 |
|
Here's an idea, Ian. GTFOH
TwinCharged - Is Now UK Opponaut
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 05:49 |
|
Look Ian, if it weren’t for such “utterly pointless cars”, the transportation you are riding around in today wouldn’t exist nor be as safe in an accident.
BlazinAce - Doctor of Internal Combustion
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 06:03 |
|
What, he’s talkimg about Formula 1? Perhaps he should take a look at McLaren’s Applied Technologies division, specially their health technology arm...
MrDakka
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 06:33 |
|
What an asshat. Does he complain about houses as well?
TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 08:14 |
|
Ian seems to have an undeservedly high opinion of himself and his views. I believe we call that sanctimonious douchebag syndrome
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 08:14 |
|
Let’s approach this in terms of the very basics of his argument. He has fallaciously assumed that his utility in a very limited set of circumstances is the only utility that exists. Cars of nearly any kind have utility higher than a low end sedan in circumstances other than he imagines - everything from a Smart car for parking to a Transit for hauling. Performance vehicles have huge utility in putting on a show, rat rods have utility in making their owners giggle. The sum of utility varies, in short. But it doesn’t stop there; it is also fallacious to assume that something needs to have utility in the first place. This is what’s known as a begged question - the question that he assumes answered is “Do vehicles need to be useful to be created - yes”. Uh, no. Burden of proving that has not yet been met. Do that part first, foo. You can’t? Oh. Oh, I see.
|
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
10/08/2015 at 08:52 |
|
The two really obvious flaws are a begged question and buckets of solipsism.
Milky
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 09:26 |
|
Ian probably uses iPod ear buds because of their worth “in terms of utility”.
and 100 more
> Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
10/08/2015 at 10:00 |
|
What kind of vehicle is he complaining about?
Camshaft Chris: Skyline/McLaren/Porsche Fanboy
> TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
10/08/2015 at 10:46 |
|
Can we just call it SaDS for short?
|
Satoshi "Zipang" Katsura
> and 100 more
10/08/2015 at 12:36 |
|
A Ferrari, a McLaren and a Porsche. Plus a certain man with a hammer.